Cases 21 - 30 of 32,601
Valentin-Martinez v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Juany Valentin-Martinez
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sena v. Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Alexis Sena
Defendant:
Torres, Villafane, Aloi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spinelli et al v. Boucher et al
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
Scott Boehm, Paul Spinelli and David Stluka
Defendant:
Brian Albert Boucher doing business as Fotovinting, John Doe 1 doing business as Plaquelady, John Doe 2 doing business as Autographsandmore_Justlook and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Raies v. Exactech U.S. Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv03872
Plaintiff:
Paul Raies and Karen Raies
Defendant:
Exactech U.S. Inc., Exactech Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
