Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Phelan v. Thomas
as 10-442
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant - Appellee: Hersh, C.O., Mt. McGregor Correctional Facility, M. Scott, C.O., Mt. McGregor Correctional, Pam Ramond, Civilian Library Clerk, Mt. McGregor Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2010cv00012
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelan v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2010cv00011
Plaintiff: Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant: Hersh, M. Scott, Pam Ramond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. The United States of America
as 1:2009cv01449
Plaintiff: Albert M. Scott
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Scott et al v. CGI North American, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02862
Plaintiff: William R. Scott and Kathy M. Scott
Defendant: CGI North American, Inc. and Herve Bonnet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Scott v. USA
as 3:2008cv00464
Petitioner: David M. Scott
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Scott v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00321
Plaintiff: Lenisha M. Scott
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mims v. Ufland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01926
Plaintiff: Robert Mims
Defendant: D. Ufland, D. Ufland, B. Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metro Networks Communications, Limited Partnership v. Scott et al
as 1:2007cv00526
Petitioner: Metro Networks Communications, Limited Partnership
Respondent: Robert M. Scott and Craig M. Firestone
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?