Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jones v. Rojee
as 3:2014cv01382
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Brian Rojee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield et al v. British Bankers Association et al
as 1:2014cv04735
Plaintiff:
Alzena Mayfield, Michael Jones and Anthony L. Jones
Defendant:
British Bankers Association, BBA Enterprises, Ltd., BBA Libor, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Raysor
as 14-1267
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Umeme Raysor, D'Von Stinson, AKA Von, Wayne Stinson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Chaka Raysor
Jones v. United States of America
as 14-210
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Jones
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Jones v. Fischer
as 13-3990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner of the Department of Correction Service, David Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, K. Rabideau, Nurse, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
D'Angelis et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv05472
Plaintiff:
Darrin Bagwell, Robert J. Battinieri, Jr., Gary Belanger and others
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A., Bayview Loan Servicing LLC, Branch Banking and Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Rubin v. Theobald et al
as 5:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
David Rubin
Defendant:
Edmond Theobald , John R. Loeffler , Vincent Giordano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2013cv03444
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
