Cases 21 - 30 of 50
United States of America v. Murphy
as 1:2013mc00042
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Thomas P. Murphy
Murphy et al v. Ma Vi. Do. Rest. Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05202
Plaintiff:
James P. Murphy , Mirco Giorgi , Marco Stella and others
Defendant:
Ma Vi. Do. Rest. Inc. and Remo Stocchi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tribune Company et al v. Murphy
as 1:2013cv03742
Debtor:
Tribune Company
Plaintiff:
Marc S. Kirschner
Defendant:
David P Murphy
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
James v. SCCF et al
as 2:2013cv02344
Defendant:
County Sheriff Demarco, Division of Parole, Bill Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Travis James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Murphy et al
as 1:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Shawn Evans
Defendant:
P. Murphy, G. Reppert, S. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaviria v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05117
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officers John Doe 1-5 and Detective Daniel P. Murphy
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Gaviria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barcomb v. Sabo
as 11-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darren Barcomb
Defendant - Appellee:
Arlene Sabo, Jerry Lottie, Lawrence Mills and others
Asphalt Specialists, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 3:2011cv00092
Plaintiff:
Asphalt Specialists, Inc.
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company , Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut , Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Echo Westly Dixon
as 10-5231
Petitioner:
Echo Westley Dixon
Respondent:
James T. Conway, Superintendent, S. Dolce, D.S.P., Joseph Corey, Captain and others
Williams v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2010mc00084
Petitioner:
Rock Williams
Respondent:
State of Connecticut and P. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
