Cases 21 - 30 of 199
Pastore et al v. Enzo Clinical Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04636
Plaintiff:
Robert Pastore, Emily Martorano and Giomar Reyes
Defendant:
Enzo Clinical Labs, Inc. and Enzo Biochem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Logan v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Joseph Logan
Defendant:
DOCCS, State of New York, NBC 5 Vermont Northern News Station and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Church of Holy Redemption et al v. Wendell, Jr., et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
The Church of Holy Redemption and Pastor Dean J. Sandstrom
Defendant:
Paul Wendell, Jr.,, Kim A. Meleen, Todd Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cano v. City of New York (NYCDOC) et al
as 1:2023cv03807
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hiram Cano
Defendant:
City of New York (NYCDOC), Patricia Yang, Michael Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
