Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Ruff v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00204
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ruff v. Auriga Trading, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv05535
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Ruff
Defendant:
Auriga Trading, LLC and Global Investors, Sociedad de Valores, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kindell v. N.Y.S. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2012cv04579
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kindell
Defendant:
Correctional Officer #8208, The City of New York, E. Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruff v. Glenn Falls City Court
as 9:2011cv01455
Petitioner:
Ronald Ruff
Respondent:
Glenn Falls City Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruff v. Divison of Criminal Justice Services et al
as 9:2011cv00437
Petitioner:
Ronald Ruff
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Sanchez (Rivera)
as 10-774
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
George Sanchez, AKA Little G, AKA Georgie, Jose Luis Sanchez, AKA Luisito, AKA Lou, Jonathan Banks, AKA Capone and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Adrian Rivera, AKA Heff
Branham et al v. Daines
as 8:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Susan Branham, Phillip Tousignant, Vera Viera and others
Defendant:
Richard F. Daines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Sanchez (Ortiz)
as 10-241
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
George Sanchez, also known as Little G, also known as Georgie, Jose Luis Sanchez, also known as Luisito, also known as Lou, Jonathan Banks, also known as Capone and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Juan Ortiz, Also known as Nano
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
