Cases 31 - 40 of 105
Amanat v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Irfan Amanat
Respondent:
Felipe Martinez and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brady v. Hess et al
as 3:2021cv01671
Plaintiff:
Monique N. Brady
Defendant:
W. Hess and Michael Carvajal
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv10774
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Cohen
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Donald J. Trump, WILLIAM BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt
Emery v. Sage et al
as 3:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Sonja Emery
Defendant:
Warden Jessica Sage, Michael Carvajal, Jessica Sage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mescall v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2021cv04924
Plaintiff:
Sean F. Mescall
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Bureau of Prisons and H. Tellez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Reynolds v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv04763
Defendant:
John ? Petrucci, Mr. Schaefler, Mr. Hewett and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Edwards Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Canarozzi
as 21-1294
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael D. Carvajal, Mr., Regional Director, M. Canarozzi, Mr., Counselor, W3, J. Draper, Mr., Case Manager, W3 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gerald J. Silva
Carvajal v. 82-60 Austin Street Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01647
Plaintiff:
Cruz Alejandro Carvajal
Defendant:
82-60 Austin Street Corp., Waterside Grill LI, Inc., Mark Boccia and others
Ocampo et al v. Pavel Partition Installers Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02343
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ocampo, Jose Carrero, Javier Mora and others
Defendant:
Ramon Doer, Jorge Cerquera, Pavel Garcia Villalobos and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davidson v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Petitioner:
James A. Davidson
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Monty Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
