Cases 31 - 40 of 179
Humphrey v. Syracuse Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00264
Defendant:
New York Defendant, Syracuse Police Department, all Federal Judges and others
Plaintiff:
John Jay Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricketts v. Joyce et al
as 3:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Robert Ricketts
Defendant:
Jackie Newhouse, Nancy Eiswirth, steven humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halladin v. Rosen
as 20-3482
Petitioner:
HUMPHREY H. HALLADIN
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Humphrey v. Syracuse Police Department et al
as 6:2021cv06205
Defendant:
New York Defendant, Syracuse Police Department, all Federal Judges and others
Plaintiff:
John Jay Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Dixon
as 20-3601
Defendant / Appellant:
Emile Dixon
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Humphrey Stewart, AKA Fathead, AKA Priest
United States of America v. Robinson
as 20-2969
Defendant:
Marty Humphrey, Lashaunda Tarver, AKA Shaunda, Bobby R. Graham and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Darren Clay Robinson, AKA Mountain, AKA Darren Charles Robinson
Appellee:
United States of America
Yu v. GreenSky, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Fifth Third Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Guggenheim Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Yu
Petitioner:
Luciano Felice and The Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re: John Jay Humphrey
as 20-1443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Jay Humphrey
Defendant / Appellee:
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02883
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Rubin v. Gardner Denver Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01044
Defendant:
Marc E. Jones, Brandon F. Brahm, Peter M. Stavros and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
