Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Connelly v. Komm et al
as 3:2020cv01060
Defendant:
Michael Komm, Hector Irizarry and Town of Fairfield
Plaintiff:
Diane Connelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irizarry v. Bryant et al
as 1:2020cv02696
Plaintiff:
Leidaliz Irizarry
Defendant:
FA Title Trust, Peapod, LLC and Domonic C Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Irizarry v. Long Island University
as 7:2020cv03160
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Irizarry
Defendant:
Long Island University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Irizarry v. O'Neill et al
as 3:2020cv00334
Respondent:
Ned Lamont, Attorney General, Middletown Superior Court and others
Petitioner:
Fernando Irizarry
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
United States of America v. Margolla (Lockett)
as 20-939
Defendant:
Manuel Santiago, Roberto Margolla, Sharlim Omar Morales, AKA Moren and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Lockett, AKA Wall Street
United States of America v. Greene (Liriano)
as 20-721
Defendant:
Efrain Irizarry, Dot, Rene Garo, Jr., AKA Ray Banger, Timothy Greene and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Samuel Liriano
Appellee:
United States of America
Irizarry v. Cortlandt Associates LLC et al
as 1:2019cv09602
Defendant:
Cortlandt Associates LLC, Edward Khalil and Paul Sohayegh
Plaintiff:
Eladio A. Irizarry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Woolard v. Santiago et al
as 3:2019cv01256
Defendant:
Richard Inzarry, Julian Russell, John Aldi and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Woolard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pierre v. Bloom
as 19-1567
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas C. Palmer, Chief Administrator, Lois Bloom, Magistrate of EDNY-Judicial System, Chief Judge Dora L. Irizarry and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jean-Gespere Pierre
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
