Cases 31 - 40 of 271
Cox v. The City of New Rochelle
as 20-3740
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory Herring, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as an employee of the City of New Rochelle Police Department, Grant O'Donnell, as an employee of the Westchester County District Attorney Office and Individually, Police Officer Rocco Oppedisano, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as an employee of the City of New Rochelle Police Department (Shield #32) and others
Defendant:
Vincent Quiao
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert A. Cox
Kastner v. Tri State Eye
as 20-3671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph R.E. Kastner
Defendant:
Third Party CIGNA, United States of America, All Represented by the US Attorney through the US Food & Drug Administration, USA et al. through the EEOC, through the "SSAUSA" et al.The US Inspector General,USA et al., United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Tri State Eye, et al., Crystal Run Healthcare, Coverys RFG, Inc., is serviced by ProSelect Insurance Company, CRHC REP #1 Mr. Douglas Sansted(Esq. Not LLP) CRHC Rep. #2 Kristen Larson Doyle(Esq Not LLP) Jeffrey Feldman Doyle(Esq not LLP) are all reps of FKC&S CRHC exclusiv, Feldman, Kleidman, Coffey & Sappe, Attorneys at Law FKC&S Rep #1 Kristen Larsen Doyle (Esq Not LLP) are all Reps of FKC&S CRHC Exclusively Esqs. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane and John Doe 1-20, Personal Injury / Pain Suffering, Emotional Physical Psychological Distress Litigation, and Lost Income of 32 Years Past, Present and Future, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Civil Rights with High Prejudice
Greenberg et al v. Pentegra Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv08503
Plaintiff:
Chrystal Lewis, Richard Greenberg, Lindsey Clark and others
Defendant:
Pentegra Services, Inc., John Does 1-20, The Board of Directors of Pentegra Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Khan et al v. Board of Directors of Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan et al
as 7:2020cv07561
Plaintiff:
Imran Khan, Joan Bullock and Pamela Joy Wood
Defendant:
William E. Hawkins, Jr., John E. Pinto, George W. Hermann and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Richard Greenberg, Gregory S. Digsby, Lindsey Clark and others
Consolidated Defendant:
The Board of Directors of the Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Melohn v. Stern et al
as 7:2020cv05536
Respondent:
JOHN DOES 1-20 (Fictitious Names), Eli Kuntslinger, Robert Kuntslinger and others
Petitioner:
Michael Melohn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robertson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv02287
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officers "John Doe" #1-20 and P.O. Christopher Signorile
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cayuga Nation v. Tanner
as 20-1310
Plaintiff:
Gary Wheeler, John Does 1-20, Richard Lynch and others
Counter Claimant:
Board of Trustees of the Village of Union Springs, New York, Howard Tanner, Village of Union Springs Code Enforcement Officer, in his official capacity, Village of Union Springs, New York and others
Defendant:
Edward Trufant, Village of Union Springs Mayor, in his official capacity
Paesano et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 7:2019cv10979
Defendant:
DR. ROBERT LOBEL, M.D., Police Officers John Does 1-20, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH PAESANO and ANTHONY PAESANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Savage et al v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv06840
Defendant:
Lori D'Ambrosio, John Does 1-20, Kathleen DeCann and others
Plaintiff:
James Sherburne, Ronald Cohen, Ashley Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sparks v. Holland et al
as 9:2019cv01269
Defendant:
William LeClair, Patrick Clancy, French and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
