Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diallo v. Ruffin et al
as 1:2017cv00950
Plaintiff:
Walladho Diallo
Defendant:
Preston L. Ruffin, United States Postal Service (NY Metro Area), Agency and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams v. City of New York
as 1:2016cv08671
Plaintiff:
Williams, Valerie Ferguson, Marie Taluy and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207
Vereen v. Ruffin et al
as 3:2016cv00599
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Vereen
Defendant:
Keith Ruffin and Carlos Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin et al v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv01538
Defendant:
John Doe Police Officers 1-15 and The City Of New York
Plaintiff:
Claude Ruffin and Ali Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Ruffin
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ruffin, Jr. et al v. Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03618
Arbitrator:
PHV Rachel Aghassi, PHV Matthew J. Hank, PHV Thomas E. Hill and others
Defendant:
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC. and Avis Rent A Car System LLC
Plaintiff:
Vitta Bargainer, Ricardo Barriga-Galindo, Krystal L. Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ruffin v. Semple et al
as 3:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
John Ruffin
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
