Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07600
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Dabney v. Lapolt
as 11-372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bartram Yihni Dabney
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen Lapolt, Deputy Superintendent of Program Work at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Zernetski, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, P. Besson, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Lutes et al v. Kawasaki Motors Corp U.S.A. et al
as 3:2010cv01549
Plaintiff:
Carly Lutes , Kevin Lutes and S. L.
Defendant:
Kawasaki Motors Corp U.S.A. and Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp. U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dabney v. Lapolt et al
as 9:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Bartram Yihni Dabney
Defendant:
Karen Lapolt, Lt. Zernetski, P. Besson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund v. Linden Labor Leasing, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv00520
Plaintiff:
New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Linden Labor Leasing, LLC, Linden Warehouse & Distribution Co., Inc., Linden Bulk Transportation Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Mirvis et al
as 1:2008cv04405
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Mark Mirvis, Mark Lupolover, Michael Benzenyan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hoeft v. Connally et al
as 6:2008cv06060
Petitioner:
Rickey Lon Hoeft
Respondent:
S. L. Connally and S. M. Eilers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
L. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2007cv08786
Plaintiff:
S. L. and A. L.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Trustees of the national Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare fund. et al v. S&L Sprinkler LLC
as 1:2007mc00149
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the national Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare fund., Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Educational Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
S&L Sprinkler LLC
S & L Vitamins, Inc. v. Australian Gold, Inc.
as 2:2005cv01217
Plaintiff:
S & L Vitamins, Inc.
Defendant:
Australian Gold, Inc., Australian Gold, Inc. and Australian Gold, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Australian Gold, Inc., Australian Gold, Inc., Australian Gold, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
S & L Vitamins, Inc., S & L Vitamins, Inc., S & L Vitamins, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Australian Gold, Inc., Australian Gold, Inc., Australian Gold, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Larry Sagarin, Larry Sagarin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
