Cases 41 - 50 of 17,051
Hernandez v. 24 North Restaurant LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Jose David Argueta Hernandez
Defendant:
24 North Restaurant LLC, Harpinder Singh and Sanjay Vaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David v. Whittaker
as 3:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Amanda David
Defendant:
Robert Whittaker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00500
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Best
as 24-1411
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
David K. Barr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
