Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Rahman et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
Ali Rahman and Anthonia Moultrie
Defendant:
The City of New York, Steven Amendola and P.O.'s John Doe # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cameron et al
as 1:2011cv04049
Plaintiff:
Hugh Smith
Defendant:
Cameron, Correction Officer John Doe, Correction Officer John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Shiro et al
as 1:2010cv08377
Plaintiff:
Larry Dixon
Defendant:
Dora Shiro, New York City Dept. of Correction Services, Katie Mulvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rentas v. Rowe et al
as 1:2010cv05124
Plaintiff:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Rowe, Smith, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rentas v. C.O. Rowe et al
as 1:2010cv05808
Plaintiff:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
C.O. Rowe, Captain Smith, Captain Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie v. VIP Healthcare Service
as 10-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gloria Moultrie
Defendant:
Cindy Rosen, Manager, VIP Healthcare Services and VIP Healthcare Services
Defendant - Appellee:
Stationary Engineers Local 670 AFL-CIO and Dallas Lucas, President, Stationary Engineers Local 670
Moultrie v. VIP Healthcare Service
as 10-1343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gloria Moultrie
Defendant:
Cindy Rosen, Manager, VIP Healthcare Services and VIP Healthcare Services
Defendant - Appellee:
Stationary Engineers Local 670 AFL-CIO and Dallas Lucas, President, Stationary Engineers Local 670
Moultrie v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv08112
Plaintiff:
Derrick Moultrie
Defendant:
The City of New York, Robert Johnson and Several NYPD Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
