Cases 41 - 50 of 16,856
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mayorga-Salamanca v. Garland
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL MAYORGA-SALAMANCA, CAROL ANDREA SUAREZ-CHAPARRO and SARA SOFIA MAYORGA-SUAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Murphy v. County of Chemung
as 24-1534
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. MURPHY, JR., -
Defendant:
WILLIAM WASHBURN, COUNTY OF CHEMUNG, CITY OF ELMIRA and others
Sullivan v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Anne Lamont, Kamala Harris, Ned Lamont and others
Kazlas v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04301
Plaintiff:
Melanie Kazlas
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. d/b/a New York Marriott Marquis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Artis v. Baez et al
as 1:2024cv04376
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee Artis, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Baez, C.O. W. Acton, C.O. B. Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cengage Learning, Inc. et al v. Google LLC
as 1:2024cv04274
Plaintiff:
Cengage Learning, Inc., Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishing Group, LLC d/b/a Macmillan Learning, Macmillan Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
