Cases 41 - 50 of 777
Brown v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Brown
Defendant:
Edward Maldonado, Kevin Roy and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Kristine Barone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Maldonado
as 24-240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNEL POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA MALDONADO, ANN ALEXANDER, WESTBURY TEACHER ASSOCIATION and others
Maldonado Esteban v. Garland
as 24-150
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MALDONADO ESTEBAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Enriquez-Maldonado v. Garland
as 24-97
Petitioner:
CARLA FILOMENA ENRIQUEZ-MALDONADO and BRITHANY ARIANNA CONDO-ENRIQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Powell v. Maldonado
as 24-102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNEL POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA MALDONADO, ANN ALEXANDER, WESTBURY TEACHER ASSOCIATION and others
Nahuatl Nation Elders et al v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv11303
Plaintiff:
Nahuatl Nation Elders, Maria de Jesus Baltierra Maldonado and A.D.M.B.
Defendant:
Matthew Day and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marcus Brooks et al v. Warnermedia Direct LLC
as 1:2023cv11030
Petitioner:
Marcus Brooks, Katharine Guzenski, Rodrigo Maldonado and others
Defendant:
Warnermedia Direct, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Jones v. Blekis et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Blekis, Marcellin, Craig Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. First Transit/CT Transit
as 23-8029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APRIL L. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST TRANSIT, INC., CT TRANSIT, H.N.S. MANAGEMENT CO., INC. and others
Defendant:
FIRST TRANSIT/CT TRANSIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
