Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Melton v. Colvin
as 14-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlene Olivia Melton
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Foster et al v. City of New York, New York
as 1:2014cv04142
Plaintiff:
Rozana Mandelberg, Frederick Savory, Delores Johnson and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
White v. Melton et al
as 1:2014cv03204
Plaintiff:
Jamel White
Defendant:
Melton, Harris, Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv09108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Melton v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 1:2013cv04245
Plaintiff:
Willie Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Melton v. Colvin
as 6:2013cv06188
Plaintiff:
Marlene Olivia Melton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ernest Melton Miller, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carter v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06422
Plaintiff:
Melton Carter
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
