Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 54
In re Air Cargo Shipping Servi
as 11-5464
Plaintiff / Appellant: One of more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3993, Alluvion Inc. v. ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al.,, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3001, Maria's Collections, Inc. v. Air France-KLM et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG and others
Plaintiff: One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3985, Harry Okabe Flowers v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3976, Lynn Culver v. Air Canada et al and others
Defendant / Appellee: Thule, Inc., EL AL Israel Airlines, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-827, Helen's Wooden Crafting Co. v. Air Canada et al and others
Defendant: Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Lufthansa Cargo AG and others
Debtor: In re: Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
In re Air Cargo Shipping Servi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-5464
Debtor: In re: Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-888, ABM International, Inc. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-706 Fleurchem, Inc. v. British Airways et al and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-1011, JCK Industries, Inc. v. British Airways, PLC et al, One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-3001, Maria's Collections, Inc. v. Air France-KLM et al and others
Defendant: One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-997, Spitz v. Air France-KLM et al, One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG and others
Defendant - Appellee: One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-827, Helen's Wooden Crafting Co. v. Air Canada et al, One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-981, Global Apparels Kenya (EPZ), Ltd. v. British Airways PLC et al, One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-3185, Niagara Frontier Distribution, Inc. v. Air France ADS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04332
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brooks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02938
Plaintiff: Keith Brooks
Defendant: The City of New York, Alexander Rapp and P.O.'s John Doe #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00936
Plaintiff: Tanya Giles
Defendant: The City of New York, Angel Gonzalez, Pedro Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Martino et al
as 5:2010cv00637
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Robert Martino
Garnishee: Bill Rapp Nissan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Rapp v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv09429
Plaintiff: Emily Marie Rapp
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rapp et al v. Allied Irish Bank, P.L.C.
as 1:2009cv08059
Plaintiff: Ronald Rapp and Douglas Marron
Defendant: Allied Irish Bank, P.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Jones v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2009cv01058
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: Joseph Smith, John Maly, Pedro Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?