Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-17
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gabilly v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2019cv11884
Defendant:
Rahul Dass, Lateef Stinson, City Of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Julien Gabilly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manchanda v. Branford CT Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv09673
Defendant:
JOETTE KATZ, BRANFORD CONNECTICUT POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRANFORD CT PO BRET JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Rahul Manchanda, Esq. and Rahul Manchanda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mir v. Zucker et al
as 1:2019cv06374
Defendant:
Ralph Liebling, M.D., Kimberly Kirchmeyer, M.D. Howard Zucker and others
Plaintiff:
Jehan Zeb Mir, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manchanda v. Navient Student Loans
as 1:2019cv05121
Plaintiff:
Rahul Manchanda, Esq.
Defendant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manchanda v. Matties et al
as 1:2018cv11092
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Corey Cohen, Jamie Wozman, Michael Furman and others
Defendant:
Daniel Powell, Douglass Senderoff, Kate Bose and others
Plaintiff:
Rahul Manchanda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Steel Construction LLC et al
as 1:2018cv06416
Defendant:
1095 Avenue of the Americas Condo, Rahul Dutt Sandal, Steel Construction LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Khan v. Sessions
as 18-1982
Petitioner:
Rahul Amin Khan
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
