Cases 41 - 50 of 209
Raymond v. Starbucks Coffee Company
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christopher Raymond
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones-Foradas v. Starbucks Coffee Company
as 7:2021cv11039
Plaintiff:
Viviane Jones-Foradas
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Jones-Foradas v. Starbucks Coffee Company
as 7:2021cv11038
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Viviane Jones-Foradas
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Thurlow v. Starbucks Corp
as 3:2021cv01495
Plaintiff:
Lulie Thurlow
Defendant:
Starbucks Corp doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Fox v. Starbucks Corporation
as 21-2531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rafael Fox, Paul D'Auria and Jill Shwiner
Defendant / Appellee:
Starbucks Corporation, DBA Starbucks Coffee Company
New WTC Retail Owner LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2021cv07132
Counter Defendant:
New WTC Retail Owner LLC
Counter Claimant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riseandshine Corporation v. Pepsico, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06324
Plaintiff:
Riseandshine Corporation doing business as Rise Brewing
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc.
Intervenor:
Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
136-61 Roosevelt LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2021cv03560
Plaintiff:
136-61 Roosevelt LLC
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Hicks et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04709
Plaintiff:
Joanne Hicks-Campbell and Joanne Hicks
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Rodriguez v. Starbucks Corp et al
as 3:2021cv00701
Defendant:
Jillian Sa, Shirley Hall and Starbucks Corp
Plaintiff:
Dayshawn Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
