Cases 41 - 50 of 247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Thorne
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Vivian Ann Hill
Defendant:
Reverend Adriene Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Riverside Church et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Vivian Ann Hill
Defendant:
Riverside Church, Reverend Adriene Thorne and Riverside Church.Org
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diaz v. Jacquez et al
as 1:2022cv08443
Plaintiff:
Yudi Diaz
Defendant:
Rikers Island Jacquez, Williams, Thorn and others
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jefferson
as 22-1815
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
A. Jefferson, Pro Se Govt. Agent, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, Pro Se Govt., J. Ryan McMahon, II, Pro Se Govt. Agent and others
Finkel v. Thorn Electric, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04299
Petitioner:
Dr. Gerald R. Finkel
Respondent:
Thorn Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Jefferson
as 22-1480
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
A. Jefferson, Pro Se Govt. Agent, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, Pro Se Govt., J. Ryan McMahon, II, Pro Se Govt. Agent and others
Johnson v. Jefferson et al
as 5:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
A. Jefferson, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, J. Ryan McMahon II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thorne v. Square, Inc.
as 22-542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deeann Thorne, Demetrius Lovett, Robin Clements and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Square, Inc. and Sutton Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
