Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Acuren Inspection, Inc. v. Williams et al
as 3:2015cv01387
Plaintiff:
Acuren Inspection, Inc.
Defendant:
Vince Williams and Scott Archibald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reiburn et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02960
Plaintiff:
Ronni Reiburn , Samuel Jorgenson , Derrick L. Chambers and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Bank Of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 9:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
H. Graham, Vince, 1-10 Correction Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howington v. Eiffe et al
as 5:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Vince Leavell Howington, Sr.
Defendant:
Jason Eiffe and Michael Hard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2015mc00258
Defendant:
1-10 Correction Officer, Superintendent H. Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Hancock v. USA
as 3:2014cv01751
Petitioner:
Vince Hancock
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Media Villa v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv08624
Plaintiff:
Jose Media Villa
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Michael Zielinski, Anger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal Housing, LLC v. City of Jamestown, New York et al
as 1:2014cv00880
Plaintiff:
Royal Housing, LLC
Defendant:
City of Jamestown, New York , Samuel Teresi , Vince DeJoy, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. Condon et al
as 6:2014cv06514
Plaintiff:
Desmond Grant
Defendant:
Edward Condon, David Buchhetti, Leo Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seals v. Mintzer, Maxon, Gilbertson- OBGYN Associates et al
as 1:2014cv06129
Plaintiff:
Tina Seals
Defendant:
Mintzer, Maxon, Gilbertson- OBGYN Associates, Temani Aldine, Antonio Vince Edward Moore, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
