Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Williams v. Conway et al
as 1:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
James Conway, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Appel et al
as 1:2012cv02331
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Victor Appel, Sharon Appelbaum, Michael Croce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikac v. Town of Hamburg et al
as 1:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Mikac
Defendant:
Town of Hamburg and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. La Valley
as 12-1074
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas La Valley
In Re: Richard Pitcher
as 12-823
Petitioner:
Richard Pitcher, AKA Rags
Plaintiff - Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sergeant Michael Adams, AKA Big Man, AKA Bowser, Erroldo Weatherly, AKA Junior, AKA Dapper, Tyrone Browne, AKA "T" and others
United States of America v. William
as 12-281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Xavier Williams, AKA Ohn X, AKA Xavier Torres, AKA Richie Foster, Elijah Bobby Williams, AKA Paul Bosco, AKA Bobby Torres and Kelly Rolon
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Williams
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 1:2011cv09607
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, State of New York, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2011cv01427
Plaintiff:
Michael William Potter, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. United States of America
as 11-3428
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Williams et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04706
Plaintiff:
Hudson Williams , Michael Williams and Latoya Williams
Defendant:
The City of New York, Nelson Pabon, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
