Cases 51 - 60 of 303
Padilla Sandoval v. Yeshiva Tzoin Yosef Pupa Inc
as 1:2021cv10417
Plaintiff:
Hilma Padilla Sandoval
Defendant:
Yeshiva Tzoin Yosef Pupa Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Salaverria v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv09254
Plaintiff:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant:
The United States of America, Department of Homeland Security (USDHS), Unidentified Agents Acting in the name of USDHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles
as 21-2473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Prison Parole Dept. and Greg Abbott, Gov. of Texas
DeLeon-Padilla v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00987
Plaintiff:
Luis Orlando DeLeon-Padilla
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Perry (Padilla)
as 21-1998
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Damien Perry, AKA Primo and Cecil Stanley
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Padilla, AKA Twin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv05623
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez Gil et al v. 367 Bake Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv05574
Defendant:
Kamal Khadir, 367 Bake Corp. doing business as Tasty Catering, 126 Bake Corp. doing business as Tasty Cafe and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro M. Ramirez Gil, Gustavo Adrian Cruz Lopez, Patricio Ramos Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martinez-Padilla v. Garland
as 21-6348
Petitioner:
SIRLENI VANESSA MARTINEZ-PADILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Angamarca v. Garland
as 21-6350
Petitioner:
JOSE LIZANDRO ANGAMARCA and FLOR MARIA PADILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Yorro v. Cano et al
as 1:2021cv04802
Defendant:
John Beluchie, John Sweeney, Miriam Padilla and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cano Yomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
