Cases 61 - 70 of 173
Wallace v. J.M. Romich Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv06424
Plaintiff:
Crandall Wallace
Defendant:
J.M. Romich Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Lewis v. Rivera et al
as 3:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
Christopher J.M. Lewis
Defendant:
Rivera, Beebe, Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.M. v. SCO Family of Services
as 2:2017cv00306
Plaintiff:
J.M.
Defendant:
SCO Family of Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drevea et al v. Allied Professionals' Insurance Services et al
as 1:2016cv06958
212) 267-0082 (fax:
Allied Professionals' Insurance Services and J.M. Woodworth Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anca Drevea and Ioan Drevea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Quiles v. Clark et al
as 6:2016cv06645
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Quiles
Defendant:
B. Clark, J.M. Ames, E. Hinma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendelka et al v. Penson Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07393
Petitioner:
Jerzy Mendelka, NDV Investment Company and J.M. Property Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.
Respondent:
Penson Financial Services, Inc. and Penson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Murray J.M. et al v. Valente et al
as 7:2016cv06795
Plaintiff:
Ethlean Murray and J.M.
Defendant:
Jonathan Valente, Karen Gagliardi, George Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Fulton v. Baltazar et al
as 1:2016cv06085
Petitioner:
James Fulton
Respondent:
J. Baltazar, Administrators Staff, F.B.O.P. Administrative Remedy Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
