Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 257
Eastport Union Free School District et al v. Transportation Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv02361
Plaintiff: EASTPORT-SOUTH MANOR CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT and EASTPORT-SOUTH MANOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, as successor in interest, Benedict Merendino, Richard Schmidt and others
Defendant: Transportation Insurance Company, CNA FINANCIAL CORP., NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD successor by merger to TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Eastport Union Free School District et. al. v. Transportation Insurance Company et. al.
as 2:2020cv02361
Plaintiff: EASTPORT-SOUTH MANOR CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT and EASTPORT-SOUTH MANOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, as successor in interest, Benedict Merendino, Richard Schmidt and others
Defendant: Transportation Insurance Company, CNA FINANCIAL CORP., NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD successor by merger to TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
U.S. Bank National Association v. Keybank, National Assication We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03577
Defendant: Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC, Keybank, National Association, As Successor By Merger To Keycorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc. and Keybank, National Association
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee, As Successor In Interest To Bank Of America, N.A., As Trustee For The Registered Holders Of Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Global Reinsurance Corporation v. Century Indemnity Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1476
Appellant: Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, successor in interest to Constitution Reinsurance Corporation
Counter Claimant: Century Indemnity Company, successor in interest to CCI Insurance Company, successor in interest to Insurance Company of North America
Rose v. Central Mortgage Company
as 1:2020cv01520
Plaintiff: Hansen Rose
Defendant: CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY d/b/a ARVEST CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, Central Mortgage Company, U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee, Successor In Interest To Bank Of America, National Association, As Trustee, Successor By Merger To Lasalle Bank National Association, As Trustee For Mo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McDaniel v. Revlon Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01711
Plaintiff: Edward McDaniel and Laura McDaniel
Defendant: Revlon Inc., Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. and Revlon, Inc. as Successor-in-Interest to Jean Nate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as
Simmons v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01066
Defendant: Botia Plotch, Bank Of America, Franklin First Financial Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Sylvia C. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc., and v. National Labor Relations Board
as 20-361
Petitioner: Alter Ego, City Wide Paving, Inc. and Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc., and it's Successor in Interest
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc.
as 20-77
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc., and it's Successor in Interest and Alter Ego, City Wide Paving, Inc.
Dowe v. Prudential Financial Inc.
as 20-16
Defendant / Appellant: Leeds, Morelli and Brown LLP, Steven A. Morelli, Leeds, Morelli and Brown PC and others
Defendant: Eric Schwimmer, Prudential Financial Inc., parent and successor in interest to Prudential Securities Incorporated, Gerald E. Harper and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Elvie Moore, Maureen Dowe, individually and on behalf of those Class Members similarly situated and Esther Buckram

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?