Cases 71 - 80 of 166
Sage Dining Services, Inc. v. Ash Restaurant Group Inc
as 7:2017cv09738
Plaintiff:
Sage Dining Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Ash Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Adger v. Ash
as 6:2017cv06563
Plaintiff:
Gerald Adger
Defendant:
Steven Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stonick v. Westport et al
as 3:2017cv01365
Plaintiff:
Katherine Stonick
Defendant:
Town of Westport , Ashely Delvecchio , David Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv06003
Plaintiff:
Kari Roberts , Arleane Joseph , Shellie Anderson and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asher B. Edelman, as Executor of the Estate of Mildred Ash v. Spoelstra
as 1:2017cv04792
Plaintiff:
Asher B. Edelman, as Executor of the Estate of Mildred Ash
Defendant:
Remko Spoelstra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Triplett v. Ash et al
as 9:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
Omar Triplett
Defendant:
Chad Ash, Mark Martin, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. New York State Supreme Court f
as 17-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Reaves
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Supreme Court for the Second Judicial District, Sylvia G. Ash, Bruce M. Balter and others
Securities and Exchange Commisison v. Narayan et al
as 1:2017mc00130
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commisison
Defendant:
Ash Narayan, The Ticket Reserve Inc., Richard M. Harmon and others
Receiver:
Michael D. Napoli
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case - Other
Lanning v. City of Glens Falls
as 17-970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lanning, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Glens Falls, City of Glens Falls Police Department, County of Warren and others
Elnicki v. City of Rutland et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Kevin Elnicki
Defendant:
City of Rutland and Ryan Ashe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
