Cases 71 - 80 of 104
United States of America v. Wilson et al
as 1:2012mc00529
Receiver:
Beattie B. Ashmore
Defendant:
Atlantic Bullion & Coin, Inc. and Ronnie Gene Wilson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Wilson et al
as 5:2012mc00051
Defendant:
Ronnie Gene Wilson and Atlantic Bullion & Coin, Inc.
Receiver:
Beattie B. Ashmore
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Fernandez v. Beattie et al
as 1:2012cv03758
Defendant:
Police Officer William Beattie and John and Jane Does 1 through 10, individually and in their official capacities, ( the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lerner v. Immelt
as 12-2787
Plaintiff:
Albert Stein
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Olga Lerner, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant General Electric Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeffrey R. Immelt, Brackett T. Denniston, III, Keith S. Sherin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Poynton et al v. Waterbury
as 3:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Troy Poynton, Michael Achlioptas, Marco Albino and others
Defendant:
City of Waterbury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Triland USA Inc. v. Beatty
as 3:2011cv01027
Plaintiff:
Triland USA Inc.
Defendant:
Brian J. Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv02284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
