Cases 81 - 90 of 212
Kotler v. Bosco et al
as 1:2017cv04954
Plaintiff:
Kerry Kotler
Defendant:
Robert Cunningham, William Connolly, John Doe #7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. McKoy et al
as 9:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bornallah Wright
Defendant:
Jeff McKoy, Anthony Annucci, Cheryl Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPhearson et al v. New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2017cv02531
Plaintiff:
Wilfred McPhearson, Carlton Walker, Jerome Nisbett and others
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Jeff McKoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. New York State
as 1:2017cv00265
Petitioner:
Terrell Hale
Defendant:
New York State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillard v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 9:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Gary Gillard
Defendant:
Michael Kirkpatrick, Donita McIntosh, Frank Bushey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Kimberleigh Hale
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hale v. Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Terrell Hale
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Mark
as 17-119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nahshon Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
Tina M. Stanford, Lawrence K. Marks, Jeff McKoy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Richardson v. State of Vermont
as 17-11
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Devin Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Vermont, Vermont Department of Corrections, Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Corrections, G. Hale, Superintendent, Northwest State Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
