Cases 1 - 10 of 1,334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carrero Silva v. State of New York
as 24-1330
Plaintiff:
SANTO CARRERO SILVA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK and MARK DUANE LENTINI, Dr.; Albany Medical
Ortega v. The Pizzeria of Islip LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03392
Plaintiff:
Santos Ortega
Defendant:
The Pizzeria of Islip LLC, Paul Saccoccio, Clifford Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Portillo v. Garland
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN SANCHEZ-PORTILLO, KAREN YANES-SANTOS, ZOE MATUTE-YANES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McNary v. Santos et al
as 1:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Jason McNary
Defendant:
Alex Santos, Jennifer Arriaga and J'Myah Freeman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mosquea v. Contract Transportation Systems Co. et al
as 2:2024cv02938
Plaintiff:
Santo Mosquea
Defendant:
Contract Transportation Systems Co. and Joel D. Aviles Samol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
