Cases 1 - 10 of 4,899
Brik v. Brodie
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
ROMAN BRIK
Defendant:
MARGO K. BRODIE, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity and ANN M. DONNELLY, DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity
Lehey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Lehey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Sitzes v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03550
Plaintiff:
Ann Sitzes
Defendant:
Exactech Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 24-1309
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, LISA FITZPATRICK, sued in their individual and official capacities, NIGEL MARKS, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jumper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Monica Ann Jumper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Hankerson v. South Hospital Brooklyn New York et al
as 1:2024cv03472
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hankerson
Defendant:
South Hospital Brooklyn New York, Commissioner Post Office, Post Office Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03598
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
