Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Husted v. Shibley
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Husted
Defendant:
Lee Shibley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Li v. Connecticut
as 22-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Li v. State of Connecticut
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Miers v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07699
Plaintiff:
George Miers
Defendant:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Dan O. Dinges, Dorothy M. Ables and others
Bushansky v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07577
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Dan O. Dinges, Dorothy M. Ables and others
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludwig v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ruiz Zayas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv00596
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Ruiz Zayas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Melvin v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Amanda Melvin and Amanda M. Melvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
