Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Darnis et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv01171
Defendant:
John H. Walker, Carrier Global Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Maurer, Christopher Doot, David Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Viera v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
as 3:2020cv00898
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Heather C. Rogers, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Joanne Viera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cupersmith v. Piaker & Lyons, P.C.
as 18-716
Plaintiff:
Neal A. Cupersmith, Frances Cupersmith, Cynthia Robbins and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Katherine C. Glasgow
Defendant - Appellee:
Piaker & Lyons, P.C., Ronald L. Simons and Timothy N. Paventi
Cupersmith v. Piaker & Lyons, P.C.
as 17-3513
Plaintiff:
Neal A. Cupersmith, Frances Cupersmith, Peter Zakroff and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cynthia Robbins, Ilene K. Nemeth, Robert T. Nemeth and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Piaker & Lyons, P.C., Timothy N. Paventi and Ronald L. Simons
Cupersmith v. Piaker & Lyons, P.C.
as 17-373
Petitioner:
Neal A. Cupersmith, Frances Cupersmith, Cynthia Robbins and others
Respondent:
Piaker & Lyons, P.C., Ronald L. Simons and Timothy N. Paventi
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Rogers
as 2:2015cv06304
Defendant:
Ryan C. Rogers
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
CUPERSMITH et al v. PIAKER & LYONS, P.C. et al
as 3:2014cv01303
Plaintiff:
NEAL A. CUPERSMITH , FRANCES CUPERSMITH , CYNTHIA ROBBINS and others
Defendant:
PIAKER & LYONS, P.C. , RONALD L. SIMONS and TIMOTHY N. PAVENTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Modley et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2007cv02168
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Modley, Nita Toy, Cleveland Amos and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
