Cases 1 - 10 of 570
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Mirinaviciene v. Keuka College
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
STACEY MIRINAVICIENE
Defendant:
KEUKA COLLEGE, AMY STOREY, BRADLEY FUSTER and others
Perez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Ometrius Perez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Connecticut Department of Correction, Colleen Gallager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Alger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00352
Defendant:
Colleen Alger and Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Crenshaw v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Yesu, Zuckerbraun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerwick v. Pullman & Comley LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ms. Colleen Mary-Elaine Kerwick
Defendant:
Pullman & Comley LLC, State of Connecticut, Kenneth D. Savino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Kerwick v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Colleen Ni Chairmhaic (Colleen Kerwick) and Colleen Kerwick
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Pullman & Comley, Kenneth Savino and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jordan v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin, Oles, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
