Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Oudekerk v. Bolmen et al
as 9:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Oudekerk
Defendant:
Bolmen, Brennan, Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Rubio et al
as 3:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Marco Rubio, Rick Scott, Chris Coons and others
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Coons v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Steven Coons
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coon v. USA
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Nancy Coon
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
WSP USA Buildings Inc. v. Coon
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
WSP USA Buildings Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen Coon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McFadden v. Heller et al
as 1:2022cv00753
Plaintiff:
Robert McFadden
Defendant:
Sgt. Heller, Nurse Warr, Officer Lutsic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
