Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Amigo Shuttle Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
as 24-1087
Plaintiff:
AMIGO SHUTTLE INC. and MICHAEL H. CONNERY, JR.
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, KEW T FLYER INC., CHRISTINA CONTUMELIO and others
Dooley et al v. VIP All State Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02981
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dooley
Defendant:
VIP All State Service, Inc. and Huseyn Hajiyev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Dooley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
James Clinton Dooley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alicea v. Dooley
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Maria Mercedes Alicea
Defendant:
Kari A. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amigo Shuttle Inc., et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
as 1:2022cv10361
Plaintiff:
Amigo Shuttle Inc.,, Michael H. Connery and Michael H. Connery, Jr.
Defendant:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Kew T. Flyer Inc., Christina Contumelio and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 14 Clayton Act
Andrews v. Dooley
as 3:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P. Andrews
Defendant:
Kari A. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bizzell et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05745
Plaintiff:
Kamiyah Bizzell, Gibran Johnson and Calvin Peterson
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Michael Dalia, William Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dooley v. United States of America
as 22-995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Dooley
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Eastchester Tobacco & Vape Inc. et al v. Town of Eastchester et al
as 7:2021cv06996
Plaintiff:
Eastchester Tobacco & Vape Inc., Eastchester Service Station Inc., Eastchester Service Center Inc. and others
Defendant:
Town of Eastchester, Eastchester Town Board, Anthony S Colavita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
