Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fogle v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Charone Fogle
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 2:2021cv03708
Defendant:
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc
Plaintiff:
Katesha Smith and Miranda Fogle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fogle v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv00431
Defendant:
Christiana Rivera-Magda, United States Postal Service and USA
Plaintiff:
Brian Fogle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01545
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. TufAmerica, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01989
Interpleader_plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc.
Interpleader_defendant:
TufAmerica, Inc., EMI Consortium Songs, Inc. , EMI Unart Catalog, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Malone v. Galleon Group, LLC
as 17-28
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William J. Malone
Defendant - Appellee:
Galleon Group, LLC, DBA New Silk Route Growth Capital LLC, Raj Rajaratnam, Zvi Goffer, AKA Octopussy and others
Malone v. Galleon Group LLC et al
as 1:2016cv08572
Plaintiff:
William J. Malone
Defendant:
Galleon Group LLC, Raj Rajaratnam, Zvi Goffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogle et al v. Cox et al
as 1:2016cv05870
Defendant:
Briad Wenco LLC, P.O. Sean Cox, P.O. John Doe #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Janvieve Fogle and ZR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
