Cases 1 - 10 of 23
BREWER v. LAPPIN
as 1:2012cv03250
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brewer
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Lanz
as 11-4439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sala-Thiel Thompson
Defendant:
Theresa Lanz, I/O, Wayne Choinski, I/O, Lynn Milling, I/O and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Philippi, I/O
Davis v. Perdue et al
as 9:2011cv01139
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Russell A. Perdue, Deborah G. Schult, David Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dragonetti v. Terrell et al
as 1:2011cv02007
Petitioner:
Vincent Dragonetti
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Judd v. Holder
as 11-1606
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice and others
Barone v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Joseph Steven Barone
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric Holder and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Judd v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00251
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G. Lappin, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simmons v. Nally, et al
as 9:2003cv01093
Plaintiff:
Alan E. Simmons
Defendant:
Michael K. Nally , Darryl D. Drew , Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fournier v. Zickefoose et al
as 3:2009cv00224
Petitioner:
Michelle Fournier
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McClinton v. Zickefoose et al
as 3:2009cv00118
Petitioner:
Barbara McClinton
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
