Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Irvin v. Exactech US Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Martha Irvin
Defendant:
Exactech US Inc and Exactech Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dozier v. Dozier et al
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Janice D. Dozier
Defendant:
Irvins Dozier, Mary V. Dozier-Cromer, Elain Fergerson-Dozier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holland v. Irvin
as 23-7329
Respondent:
WARDEN, WARDEN, FRANK E. IRVIN and Ward
Petitioner:
CLAUDE HOLLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Vasquez (Wilkin De Los Santos)
as 22-3164
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gerald Vasquez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Gary Bierd, AKA Gary Bird, AKA V.O., Irvin Castillo, AKA Mune and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wilkin De Los Santos
Santos v. The Syracuse Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Dos Santos, III
Defendant:
The Syracuse Police Department, Det. Mathew Fraher, Det. Kate Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Irvin
as 22-1650
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jakeel Irvin, AKA Tick
Irvin v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv04887
Petitioner:
Lature Irvin, Sr.
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irvin v. Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv02806
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Irvin
Defendant:
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated, John Knox Singleton, Todd J. Meredith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
