Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bidone v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Mandel Bidone
Defendant:
United States, Yale New Haven Inc., State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Howard v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jevon Howard
Defendant:
Shawn Jay-Z Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Carter
as 22-1557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jermaine Jevon Howard, "Chooie"
Defendant / Appellee:
Shawn Jay-Z Carter, (Rocafella Records)
Defendant:
Kareem Biggs Burke, (Rocafella Records) and Damon Dame Dash, (Rocafella Records)
Walker v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Tauheedepps, Sean John Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross et al v. Harrell et al
as 1:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
Darnell Ross, Jewel, Sharon Jennifer and others
Defendant:
Bruce Harrell, Union Pacific Rail Line, Jay Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harris v. Sony Entertainment
as 20-3774
Defendant / Appellee:
Jermaine Dupri, Mariah Carey, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Latoya J. Harris
Howard v. Carter et al
as 1:2020cv00417
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jevon Howard
Defendant:
Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Damon Dame Dash and Kareem Biggs Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Carter et al
as 1:2020cv00691
Defendant:
Rapper Jay Z and Shawn Corey Carter
Plaintiff:
Enzo Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. N.Y.P.D. D.O.T. et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
All Record Compye's, Barock Obama, Jay-Z Rapper and others
Plaintiff:
Romial Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker, Jr. v. Carter
as 17-2574
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dwayne D. Walker, Jr. and Gregory Berry
Defendant:
Kareem Burke, "Biggs"
Defendant - Appellant:
Shawn Carter, "Jay-Z", Damon Dash, "Dame", Universal Music Group, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
