Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Everson v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 23-790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Daniel Everson
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Corrections, Theresa Lantz, John Armstrong, Nelvin Levester and others
Everson v. Lantz
as 21-17
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Corrections, Robert Carbone, John Armstrong and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Daniel Everson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everson v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 19-882
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Carbone, Theresa Lantz, Commissioner of Corrections, John Armstrong and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Everson
Webb v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01623
Plaintiff:
Daniel J.A. Webb
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Leo Arnone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piechowicz v. Lancaster Central School District et al
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Denise Piechowicz
Defendant:
Lancaster Central School District , Peter F. Kruszynski , Lancaster Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Armstrong (Brown)
as 11-5241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Armstrong, AKA "Peso", Justice Cephas, AKA "Woodrow Jackson", AKA "Man", AKA "Reginald Murray", Malcolm Feaster, AKA "Romie" and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Brown, AKA "Nightcrawler"
Webb v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2011cv01557
Plaintiff:
Daniel J.A. Webb
Defendant:
John Armstrong, Brian K. Murphy, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
