Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mitchell v. New York Graphics Studio, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv09690
Defendant:
New York Graphics Studio, Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Draper L Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodward v. Tillinghast et al
as 1:2012cv00961
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Tillinghast, Dalia, Furney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paolucci v. Render, Kamas Law Firm
as 12-3476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barbara Paolucci
Defendant - Appellee:
Render, Kamas Law Firm and all partners from 1995 to the present
Paolucci v. Render, Kamas Law Firm and all partners from 1995 to the present
as 1:2012cv04737
Plaintiff:
Barbara Paolucci
Defendant:
Render, Kamas Law Firm and all partners from 1995 to the present
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nealy v. Kamas et al
as 6:2012cv06201
Plaintiff:
William Nealy
Defendant:
P. Kamas, P. Mastrantonio and James Escfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Napoli et al
as 9:2009cv01440
Plaintiff:
George Richardson
Defendant:
Napoli, Chappins, Kamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khulumani, et al v. Barclay Natl. Bank, et al
as 1:2003cv04524
Plaintiff:
Sakwe Balintulo Khulumani , Fanekaya Dabula , Nokitsikaye Violet Dakuse and others
Defendant:
Barclay National Bank, British Petroleum, PLC, Chevrontexaco Corp. and others
Movant:
Barclays Bank PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Richardson v. State of New York et al
as 9:2007cv00544
Plaintiff:
George M. Richardson
Defendant:
State of New York, Annetts, Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesolowski v. Kamas, et al
as 6:2003cv06405
Plaintiff:
Robert Wesolowski
Defendant:
Christopher F. Kamas , Gregory T. Manos , Thomas E. Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
