Cases 1 - 10 of 2,423
Lewis v. Redline Hockey, LLC
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS
Defendant:
REDLINE HOCKEY, LLC, DBA USA Hockey Store and USA Spirit Shop, USA HOCKEY INC., MATTHEW NYMAN and others
Scott Phillip Lewis v. Adirondack Medical Center
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS
Defendant:
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER, DBA Adirondack Health
Lewis v. Affiliated Enterprise Solutions, LLC
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS
Defendant:
AFFILIATED ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, LLC, AES MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC and BRIAN STEVENS
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03598
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Lewis v. Payroll Systems, Inc.
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS
Defendant:
PAYROLL SYSTEMS, INC., JOSEPH POMPO and KENNETH CARDARELLI
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc. v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc.
Defendant:
Phillip Lewis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
RACQUEL LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
