Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00968
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. New York City Department Of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02145
Defendant: New York City Department Of Corrections and Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Michael J. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael E. Jones, M.D., P.C. v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv06289
Defendant: NIJ, LLC d/b/a Dr. Nip and Tuck, Dr. Nicholas I. Jones, NIJ, LLC doing business as Dr. Nip and Tuck and others
Plaintiff: Michael E. Jones, M.D., P.C. d/b/a Lexington Plastic Surgeons and Michael E. Jones, M.D., P.C. doing business as Lexington Plastic Surgeons
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294
Philpot v. Counter Productions, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04307
Plaintiff: Larry G. Philpot
Defendant: Michael L. Jones, John or Jane Doe 1, John or Jane Doe 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Jones, MD, PC v. Aetna Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv09683
Plaintiff: Michael E. Jones, MD, PC
Defendant: Aetna Inc. and John Doe Entities 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv06748
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Michael R Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. SoundsGoodmusic, LLC
as 1:2019cv05586
Defendant: SoundsGoodmusic, LLC
Plaintiff: Michael J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael E. Jones, M.D., P.C. v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07972
Defendant: John Doe Entities 1-10, Optum Group, LLC, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL E. JONES. M.D., P.C., and Michael E. Jones, M.D., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Type: Contract Insurance
Jones v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv00418
Plaintiff: Michael T. Jones
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Vera v. The Republic of Cuba We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2345
Petitioner - Appellee: Alfredo Villoldo, Individually, Jeannette Fuller Hausler, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, Deceased, on behalf of Thomas Caskey as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lynita Fuller Caskey surviving daughter of Robert Otis Fuller, as court-ap, Gustavo E. Villoldo, Individually, and as Administrator, Executor, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Gustavo Villoldo Argilagos and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Aldo Vera, Jr., a Personal representative of the Estate of Aldo Vera, Sr.
Respondent: Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., RespondentGarnishee and Stakeholder/ThirdParty Petitioner, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and others
Respondent - Appellant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Respondent - Appellee: Bank of New York Mellon
Third-Party-Plaintiff: UBS AG
Third-Party-Defendant: BBVA Colombia S.A., AT&T Corp., Banco Nacional de Mexico (Banamex) and others
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, or its designee to the extent it or its designee is the successorininterest to Acueducto Yateritas, S.A., Banco Financiero Internacional S.A., Commerzbank AG, as successor in interest to Dresdner Bank AG and others
Appellee: William Fuller, court-appointed co-representatives of the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, deceased, on behalf of all beneficiaries of the Estate and the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A. and others
Intervenor: National Bank of Canada and National Bank Financial Group

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?