Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Brooks v. Williams
as 19-421
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael C. Lynch, New York State Appellate Court Judge, Justice William E. McCarthy, New York State Appellate Court Judge, Donald Williams, New York State Supreme Court Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Brooks
Lynch v. Haupt
as 1:2018cv01471
Plaintiff:
Michael R Lynch
Defendant:
Brady M Haupt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Williams et al
as 9:2018cv00997
Defendant:
Justice William E. McCarthy, Janet DiFiore, Michael C. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv06438
Plaintiff:
Stephen Brooks
Defendant:
Janet DiFiore, Michael C. Lynch, Stan L. Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch et al v. Amoruso et al
as 1:2016cv01270
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lynch and Lisa Scarola
Defendant:
Sreelekha Chakrabarty Amoruso, DeMille Halliburton, Camille Halliburton Huang and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1341
Burnett et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2015cv09903
Plaintiff:
Luis Merino, Kimberly Franco, Mary Kaye Crenshaw and others
Defendant:
The National Iranian Gas Company and Catherine Stefani
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dana Asher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Neroni v. Peebles
as 14-3000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
David E. Peebles, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Magistrate Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York, Matthew Holmes, individually and in his capacity as judicial extern for David E. Peebles, Gary L. Sharpe, individually and in his capacity as Chief Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York and others
Neroni v. Peebles et al
as 3:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant:
David E. Peebles, Matthew Holmes, Gary L. Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
