Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-183
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Wong v. Golden Nugget Online Gaming, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09331
Plaintiff:
Peter Wong
Defendant:
Golden Nugget Online Gaming, Inc., Tilman J. Fertitta, Richard H. Liem and others
Pagan et al v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2012cv07669
Plaintiff:
Wilson Pagan, Steven Lewis, Yusuf Dixon and others
Defendant:
Westchester County, Aramark Commissary and Food Services, Donna Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Warden Terry Billingsley
as 12-3739
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Respondent - Appellee:
Terry Billingsley, Warden (F.C.I.) Otisville, NY, Regional Director Norwood, Regional Office Pennsylvania and Director of the Bureau of Prisons, Washington, D.C.
Gorbey v. Warden Terry Billingsley et al
as 1:2012cv03140
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden Terry Billingsley, Regional Director Norwood and Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. Billingsley et al
as 1:2012cv03141
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Respondent:
Terry Billingsley, Norwood Regional Director and Director of Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller et al v. The City of Schenectady et al
as 1:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Robin Miller and Mark A. Miller
Defendant:
The City of Schenectady, Schenectady Police Department, John N. Favata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
