Cases 1 - 10 of 12,650
Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Seritta R Richardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith v. Maciol et al
as 6:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Robert Maciol, Oneida County Sheriff's Department, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andujar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Andujar, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03730
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Davies v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Daniel N. R. Davies
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cicchiello v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv00855
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Colette Peters and R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stapleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Nathan R. Stapleton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Michell et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03442
Plaintiff:
George R. Michell, Michell North LLC, Michell.Bradley LLC and others
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's USA, LLC, Joseph Chiczewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Turner III v. John Doe
as 24-1242
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. TURNER, III
Defendant:
EDWARD RAPP and JOHN DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
