Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Crenshaw v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Yesu, Zuckerbraun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Victor Anderson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Robert Richeson, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Angel Quiros, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wang v. Quiros
as 23-235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lishan Wang
Defendant / Appellee:
Marie Charles, Nurse/NA of MacDougall CI and Harmon, Correctional Officer (CO), MacDougall CI
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, DOC Commissioner, Nick Rodriguez, District Administrator, Rollin Cook, Former DOC Commissioner and others
Staton v. Lamont
as 23-99
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrell Staton
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, C/O John Bowen, Lt. Oullette and others
Defendant:
Scanning Program - Robinson
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Washington et al
as 3:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
James Raynor
Defendant:
Washington, Lugo, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Staton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, John Bowen, Oullette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
