Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv06518
Defendant:
Perfecting Faith Church, Carly Bass, Nathan Lee Both Plumbers and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv04915
Defendant:
Darren T. Moore, Nathan Lee, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gossett v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Brian Gossett
Defendant:
Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry, Albert Fouerti and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Maschhoff v. Polished.com Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06606
Plaintiff:
Ryan Maschhoff
Defendant:
Polished.com Inc., Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Porraro, Eden Alpha CI LP and Ari Gold
Wong v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Mei Ling Wong
Defendant:
Douglas T. Moore, Robert Barry, Albert Fouerti and others
GOSSETT v. BARRY et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GOSSETT
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BARRY, DOUGLAS T. MOORE, ALBERT FOUERTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
United States of America v. Moore
as 19-2915
Defendant / Appellant:
Samuel T. Moore
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Davison v. Bunce et al
as 9:2019cv00653
Defendant:
R. Purlier, Rocque (Female), R. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Moore
as 19-1390
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan T. Moore
United States of America v. Account Nos. 5390370209 and 4018473086, Contents In et al
as 2:2018cv00106
Defendant:
Account No. 9500113908, Contents In and Account Nos. 5390370209 and 4018473086, Contents In
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Sandra T. Moore and Brendan L. Connolly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
