Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Whitfield v. Buechler et al
as 1:2024cv03176
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Kenneth F. Buechler, Ph.D., Evelyn S. Dilsaver, Edward L. Michael and others
Hammad et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Nusayba Hammad, Eric Horowitz, Sajia Hanif and others
Defendant:
William C. Thompson, Jr., Sandra Wilkin, Michael Aravanites and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Kelly v. DCC Technologies Holdings, Inc.
as 24-1058
Not Yet Classified:
KEVIN KELLY, MARK WILKINS, DCC TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Wilkins v. Richgold Associates, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv02947
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wilkins
Defendant:
Richgold Associates, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Wilkins v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Jovan Wilkins
Respondent:
Mark J. Miller and The Attorney General of New York State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krenzer v. Wilkins et al
as 6:2024cv06007
Plaintiff:
Theresa Krenzer
Defendant:
Kyle Wilkins, Finger Lakes Railway Corporation, Charles Vaas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Arau (Perkins)
as 23-7752
Defendant:
XAVIER ARAU, HENRY JONES, CASSIUS MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIJAH PERKINS and Eli
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez v. Dunn et al
as 1:2023cv08313
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rodriguez
Defendant:
Lesile Dunn, Kathleen Hobson, Shakia Wilkins-Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkins v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv07263
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kenneth Wilkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
